Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer

The NAR Ethics Complaint Process

13 minPRO
2/6

Key Takeaways

  • Ethics complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged violation or discovery.
  • The Grievance Committee screens complaints for viability; the Professional Standards Committee conducts hearings.
  • The standard of proof in ethics hearings is "clear, strong, and convincing evidence."
  • Sanctions range from letters of warning to fines up to $15,000, suspension, or expulsion.
  • Arbitration addresses compensation disputes and produces binding financial awards — distinct from ethics hearings.

The NAR ethics enforcement process provides a structured mechanism for addressing complaints against Realtors. Understanding the process is important both for agents who may need to file a complaint and for those who may need to respond to one. The process is designed to be fair, transparent, and less costly than litigation.

Filing an Ethics Complaint

Any person — whether a Realtor, a consumer, or a member of the public — can file an ethics complaint against a Realtor. Complaints must be filed with the local board of Realtors where the respondent holds membership within 180 days of the alleged violation (or within 180 days of when the complainant knew or should have known of the violation). The complaint must identify the specific Articles of the Code of Ethics alleged to have been violated and provide a narrative description of the facts supporting the claim.

The complaint is reviewed by the board's Grievance Committee, which determines whether the allegations, if true, would constitute a violation of the Code. The Grievance Committee does not determine the truth of the allegations — it merely assesses whether the complaint states a viable claim. If the complaint is dismissed, the complainant may appeal. If the complaint is forwarded, it proceeds to a hearing before the Professional Standards Committee.

YearEthics Complaints FiledArbitration RequestsViolations FoundMost Common Article Violated
20203,2472,1561,105Article 1 (Client Protection)
20213,8912,4981,287Article 1 (Client Protection)
20223,6542,3121,198Article 12 (Truthful Advertising)
20234,1022,6891,354Article 1 (Client Protection)
20244,450 (est.)2,900 (est.)1,425 (est.)Article 1 / Article 9 (Cooperation)

NAR ethics complaint volumes have increased ~37% from 2020 to 2024, driven partly by the post-settlement changes to buyer representation practices. Article 1 (duty to protect client interests) remains the most commonly cited violation. Source: NAR Ethics and Arbitration Annual Reports.

The Ethics Hearing Process

The hearing is conducted before a panel of trained Realtor volunteers who serve on the Professional Standards Committee. Both the complainant and the respondent have the right to present evidence, call witnesses, and make opening and closing statements. The parties may be represented by legal counsel, although many choose to represent themselves. The standard of proof is "clear, strong, and convincing evidence," which is higher than the preponderance standard used in most civil cases but lower than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard used in criminal cases.

The hearing panel deliberates in private and issues a written decision. If a violation is found, the panel determines the appropriate sanction, which may include a letter of warning, a fine (up to $15,000), required education courses, probation, suspension of membership (up to 3 years), or expulsion from the association. The respondent has the right to appeal the decision to the board of directors.

Ethics Complaints vs. Arbitration Requests

NAR's Professional Standards process handles two distinct types of proceedings: ethics complaints and arbitration requests. Ethics complaints address alleged violations of the Code of Ethics and result in disciplinary sanctions. Arbitration requests address disputes between Realtors involving contractual rights to compensation — for example, disputes over who is entitled to a commission when multiple brokers claim to have been the procuring cause of a sale.

The arbitration process is binding on the parties, meaning the arbitration panel's decision on compensation disputes is final and enforceable. The standard of proof in arbitration is "preponderance of the evidence." While ethics and arbitration proceedings may arise from the same transaction, they address different issues: ethics focuses on conduct, while arbitration focuses on compensation.

Key Distinction
Ethics hearings address professional conduct and result in disciplinary sanctions. Arbitration hearings address compensation disputes and result in binding financial awards. They serve different purposes even when they arise from the same transaction.

Red Flags

Filing a complaint after the 180-day deadline.

The complaint is dismissed on procedural grounds regardless of its merit.

Resolution

File complaints promptly. The 180-day clock starts from when the complainant knew or should have known of the violation.

Confusing the ethics process with civil litigation.

Unrealistic expectations about remedies — the ethics process cannot award monetary damages to complainants.

Resolution

Understand that ethics hearings result in disciplinary sanctions against the respondent, not compensation to the complainant. For monetary relief, pursue civil litigation.

Escalation Pathway

1Ethics complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged violation or discovery.
2The Grievance Committee screens complaints for viability; the Professional Standards Committee conducts hearings.
3The standard of proof in ethics hearings is "clear, strong, and convincing evidence."
4Sanctions range from letters of warning to fines up to $15,000, suspension, or expulsion.
5Arbitration addresses compensation disputes and produces binding financial awards — distinct from ethics hearings.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Filing a complaint after the 180-day deadline.

Consequence: The complaint is dismissed on procedural grounds regardless of its merit.

Correction: File complaints promptly. The 180-day clock starts from when the complainant knew or should have known of the violation.

Confusing the ethics process with civil litigation.

Consequence: Unrealistic expectations about remedies — the ethics process cannot award monetary damages to complainants.

Correction: Understand that ethics hearings result in disciplinary sanctions against the respondent, not compensation to the complainant. For monetary relief, pursue civil litigation.

"Ethics Complaints, State Enforcement & Penalty Frameworks" is a Pro track

Upgrade to access all lessons in this track and the entire curriculum.

Immediate access to the rest of this content

1,746+ structured curriculum lessons

All 33+ real estate calculators

Metro-level data across 50+ regions

Test Your Knowledge

1.Within how many days must a NAR ethics complaint be filed from the date of the violation or its discovery?

2.What is the maximum fine that a NAR ethics hearing panel can impose?

3.What standard of proof is used in NAR arbitration proceedings?

Was this lesson helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve the curriculum.

Share this